Trump Warns of Global Consequences if Ceasefire with Putin Fails
President Trump warned of global repercussions if a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine isn’t reached, viewing it as critical for saving lives and normalizing relations. While proposing high U.S. financial support figures, he aims for a swift resolution, acknowledging challenges in negotiations and potential demands from Putin. The U.S. remains actively involved in military support for Ukraine amidst ongoing international discussions.
In an interview with Sharyl Attkisson on “Full Measure,” President Donald Trump expressed concern that failure to achieve a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine would result in dire consequences globally due to significant loss of life. He mentioned his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin would ultimately agree to a ceasefire, as he has insights into Putin’s mindset.
Russian foreign policy analyst Mark N. Katz noted that Trump perceives the ongoing war as detrimental not only to Ukraine but also to Russia and Europe. Katz clarified that Trump’s statements were not implying U.S. military responses, but rather reflecting a view that the conflict’s continuation is counterproductive for all parties involved.
According to Katz, Trump believes that ending the war could facilitate the normalization of relations between Russia and other nations, leading to lifted sanctions and potential U.S. investments in Russia. However, challenges remain as U.S. corporations are hesitant to invest due to prior negative experiences in the country.
On Tuesday, Trump is scheduled to speak with Putin, aiming to push for an end to the war. Ukraine has tentatively agreed to a proposed 30-day ceasefire facilitated by U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The discussions took place in Saudi Arabia, following a pivotal meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Trump emphasized the financial implications of the war, claiming that U.S. expenditures on Ukraine since February 2022 have reached $350 billion, exceeding figures released by U.S. government sources. The Council on Foreign Relations pointed out that pledges amount to about $175 billion, focusing on military aid as U.S. manufacturing for Ukraine’s needs also stimulates the U.S. economy. Despite being the largest donor, the U.S. assistance represents a smaller percentage of GDP than contributions from some European nations.
When asked about his campaign promise to end the war in 24 hours, Trump admitted to being sarcastic, explaining his intention was to signal his desire for a swift resolution. Katz indicated that this was a promise Trump understood was unrealistic, yet signified his aim to resolve the situation promptly.
However, achieving a ceasefire may prove difficult, as Putin has expressed a desire for both a ceasefire and concessions from Ukraine and the West. Katz elaborated that Russia likely wishes to maintain its territorial gains and is resistant to ongoing NATO arms support for Ukraine.
In response to potential security threats, France and Britain are considering troop deployments in Ukraine, though both are cautious about acting without U.S. backing. Additionally, potential negotiations may involve the withdrawal of North Korean troops supporting Russia in Ukraine, which Katz noted could alleviate some burden on Putin while maintaining territorial control.
Putin’s demands include assurances against NATO’s acceptance of Ukraine, which Katz views as an unrealistic expectation due to NATO’s foundational principles of collective security. Although Putin may be willing to discuss a ceasefire to preserve relations with Trump, Katz does not anticipate quick commitments from him.
If a ceasefire remains elusive, Trump may face challenging decisions regarding increased sanctions or further assistance for Ukraine, with Katz suggesting that both options are unlikely to change Putin’s behavior. He warned that Putin could leverage the situation to create tension between Trump and Ukraine, a classic strategy of divisiveness.
In summary, Trump’s insistence on securing a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine centers on humanitarian concerns and potential financial benefits. While he expresses optimism about Putin’s compliance, geopolitical complexities remain, particularly regarding territorial demands and NATO’s role. The U.S. continues to provide substantial aid to Ukraine, though challenges regarding corporate investment in Russia persist. Trump’s upcoming conversations with Putin and the dynamics of international support will significantly influence future developments.
Original Source: komonews.com
