Christian Michel Declines Bail Over Security Concerns in AgustaWestland Case

0
1171e74d-7cec-49dc-885a-760ae098bb29

Christian Michel James, accused in the AgustaWestland scam, declined bail due to security fears, willing to serve his sentence instead. Despite recent bail approvals from high courts, Michel cited safety concerns in Delhi and outlined his unwillingness to risk his well-being outside prison. The court established specific conditions for any potential release, emphasizing compliance with investigative protocols.

Christian Michel James, implicated in the AgustaWestland case, expressed willingness to “finish his sentence” rather than accept bail, citing security concerns. During a hearing with Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal, Michel indicated that he feels unsafe in Delhi, amplifying his fears that he would rather leave India.

Following the recent bail grants from the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court, the special court outlined the necessary bail conditions for Michel’s release. The court mandated him to report in person to investigating officers bi-weekly and to provide contact details to the authorities.

Michel voiced skepticism about the bail process, asserting, “Delhi is just a larger prison” as he reflected on his circumstances. His claims of insecurity were further evidenced by his statement: “I cannot accept the bail. It’s unsafe. Every time I step out of Tihar, something happens.” He was particularly worried about furnishing local sureties, having been incarcerated for six years.

The judge proposed options for Michel’s safety, suggesting he find accommodations in Delhi, but Michel insisted he preferred to discuss certain incidents privately. After a brief recess for discussions, the court solidified bail terms, which included restrictions on media interactions and additional conditions like a personal bond and surety of Rs 10 lakh.

Michel, extradited from Dubai in December 2018, is one of three middlemen under investigation in this graft case linked to a deal worth over 556 million euros. Confirmed by CBI investigations, this transaction allegedly cost the Indian government an estimated 398.21 million euros in losses, with the ED’s charges implying Michel received 30 million euros related to the deal.

Christian Michel’s saga underscores major legal and security considerations surrounding high-profile corruption cases. His reluctance to accept bail highlights severe concerns over personal safety, prompting a judicial examination of bail conditions. The ongoing investigations reflect significant financial implications linked to the AgustaWestland deal, compelling authorities to navigate complex legal frameworks in addressing such allegations.

Original Source: www.ndtv.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *