A Stephen Miller Staffer and Tough Talk: Inside Trump’s Latest Attack on Harvard
The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the Harvard Law Review, citing claims of discrimination against white men and accusing the journal of obstructing an investigation. With a cooperating witness reportedly linked to Stephen Miller in the White House, concerns grow about the administration’s use of federal power to advance its political agenda.
Last month, the Justice Department initiated an investigation into the student-run Harvard Law Review, raising eyebrows due to the controversial nature of the allegations. This move is part of the Trump administration’s ongoing campaign against Harvard, as officials suggested that white men faced discrimination within the review. Furthermore, they accused Harvard of destroying evidence linked to the inquiry, demanding immediate compliance.
Intriguingly, the Justice Department claimed to have a “cooperating witness” within the Law Review, a source confirmed to be working in the White House under Stephen Miller, a key figure in Trump’s domestic policy. This revelation adds another layer to the already tense relationship between Trump’s administration and Harvard, where officials fear the investigation may escalate from civil to criminal.
The alarming tone of the letters issued by the Justice Department’s top civil rights lawyers could be seen as an effort to ramp up pressure on Harvard. This tactic echoes a broader strategy within the Trump administration, which has often pursued rapid and shocking actions over more traditional methods of legal proceedings. From economic shifts to immigration enforcement, the administration seems to prioritise speed and intimidation.
The Justice Department’s investigation into the Harvard Law Review represents a continuation of Trump’s aggressive stance against elite institutions. With claims of discrimination and a cooperating witness linked to the White House, concerns are rising about the implications for Harvard. This investigation not only marks a significant moment in the relationship between a sitting president and a university but also highlights the administration’s approach to wielding federal power for political ends.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
